Veganuary


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Happy World Philosophy Day 2021

Celebrating World Philosophy Day!🎊🎉🎊🎉🍾🍸🍸🍸🍸🎂🍰🍫🍫🍫🍫☕🌈🤗😘🌈 Here's  the gif I posted on Facebook of Foucault🌈showing passion for philosophical discussion, with the following comment: As you can see, philosophy is a rigorous, rational, logical, analytic and passionate thought process that depends on reasoned arguments, counterarguments and counterexamples in order to test the truth within the philosophical argument. Opinions don't count as philosophy because they are inadequate ideas. Philosophy is an exhausting thinking and writing process which requires skills that you have to learn. They don't come naturally out of thin air. It is an extraordinarily difficult subject to do well!  Happy #WorldPhilosophyDay ! 🎉🍾🍸🍸🎂🍰💖💖💖💖💖💖💖
Read more

I'm an Adherent of the Philosopher, Susan James

Image
Updated 19th April 2025:  NB: Clearly people have not understood this section below on mentorship. 🙄 So I'll explain it a bit further. Just as Sue and I are mutually in love with each other so we have a mutual mentorship model. Yes it's a thing. It's not unusual. And indeed any Professor of Leadership worth their salt will confirm that this model is a very good one and works splendidly. We use it and it works for us. We both have a lot to offer each other. In academia, there's what some male Professors call 'camps', other male researchers term 'factions'. These may be a group of people who adhere to a particular academic, or it may be an individual who adheres to one particular academic because that person can connect with that academic as a person and can identify with their Philosophy and so wish to advocate their philosophy as well as develop themselves along their lines.  I am, and always have only been, since early 2010, an academic adherent of Pr...
Read more

Re-reference letter

Image
I had to chase up my second referee because he was disrupting my MRes postgraduate application to an EU uni by ignoring my email a few weeks earlier. Here's my 1st June 2016 email to him: This is the factually inaccurate, rude, totally inappropriate email response I received back from the referee:    Well, at least I assume it was written and sent by my referee because it was sent from his email account and signed by him.  However, it contains information that he should know to be false yet he writes it anyway and shows total ignorance of our previous emails in 2014. On the 13th of February 2014, he emailed: So here we see that in 2014 I have asked him if he's prepared to be a referee and he's already agreed to be second referee yet in 2016 claims I haven't "followed the conventional route of asking me whether I can provide a reference". So this email is falsely claiming I haven't done something I have! Nobody submits a "reference anonymously" - ...
Read more